Nigel Lawson, not the corporate income tax, has had his day

   2   0 Blog, Corporate Tax, Taxing corporations

xResponding to the UK government’s poor handling of tax negotiations with Google, Nigel Lawson, climate change denier and architect of one of the biggest boom-bust recessions of modern history, has told the Daily Telegraph that the corporate income tax has “had its day”.  Instead he proposes a “much” lower rate with a tax on corporate sales. According to the Telegraph, Lawson says:

“I have long argued that in the modern world corporation tax has had its day as a major source of tax revenue. It needs to be a much lesser tax, bolstered by a tax on corporate sales.

While multinationals can artificially shift profits to whatever tax jurisdictions they choose, sales are where they are, and can’t be shifted.”

All very beguiling until you stop to consider that a tax on sales would harm start-ups and businesses which aren’t making profits and therefore able to afford to pay tax. The great advantage of the corporate income tax is that it does not penalise start-ups or unprofitable businesses.

In this paper we outline ten reasons why the corporate income tax is a progressive tax, which far from being scrapped , should be comprehensively reformed to suit it to the conditions of the twenty first century.  What might that reform look like?  See here.

Faced with structural income and wealth inequality of an order of magnitude not see since the nineteenth century, the advanced economies cannot afford to give away further tax breaks to the owners of capital.  The corporate income tax is one of the bastions of a progressive tax system, and Nigel Lawson’s comments, like farting in a lift, are simply wrong at every level.

Read more about the progressive qualities of the corporate income tax here



Related Posts

UN must defend target to curtail multinational companies’ tax abuse

Photo by Luca Santori, Creative Commons LicenseThe Tax Justice Network, The Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation, and the Global Alliance for Tax Justice call on the UN Secretary General to make sure the commitment to action on tax abuses by multinational companies remains part of the new UN Sustainable Development Goals.


The BVI: Responsible for worldwide tax losses of $37.5 billion a year

BVI report blogAn extraordinary report by consultants Capital Economics, for BVI Finance, claims that the British Virgin Islands are responsible for $1.5 trillion of assets invested around the world, and that these result in 2.2 million jobs and $15 billion in tax revenue. A better approximation would be that the BVI imposes global tax losses of $37.5 […]


Event: Making Tax Work for Women in the UK and Globally

Invitation_ Tax and Gender eventOn Wednesday 28th June 2017 at 16.30 our very own Liz Nelson will be speaking at an event in London that aims to bring together gender and tax justice advocates to highlight the need for coherent and gender-responsive fiscal policies to safeguard the rights of women and girls both in the UK and globally. The […]


Historic event on women, human rights and tax justice in Bogota

BogotaLast week civil society organisations, researchers, labour union activists and policy makers met in Bogota, Colombia to explore how tax justice issues can ensure governments, multinational corporations and others meet their obligations to women in order to secure their full range of human rights. The Women’s Rights and Tax Justice conference opened with a conversation […]


The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]


2 thoughts on “Nigel Lawson, not the corporate income tax, has had his day

  1. Robert Kilbride-Newman says:

    But this sales tax could be used as an incentive for companies to provide full disclosure of their profits.
    Companies could opt to pay corporation tax as long as they make full disclosure of all relevant information, otherwise the would be taxed on sales. This way it could be used to target the multi nationals indulging in profit hiding.

  2. Thanks Robert

    We agree that full disclosure of corporate profits is an absolute must. Since 2003 TJN has advocated for a full Country by Country Reporting standard that would require all multinational companies to be transparent on sales, cost of sales, profits, and taxes paid. While CBCR is not a panacea it would certainly provide crucial information to disclose profits shifting. CBCR is mandatory, not voluntary.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top