Panama thumbs its nose at transparency – again

   2   1 Blog, Corruption, Information Exchange, Secrecy

Flag_of_PanamaWe have on several occasions fingered Panama as a particularly recalcitrant secrecy jurisdiction: our recent Panama Narrative Report spills a fair number of beans in that respect. Its recalcitrance is perhaps hardly surprising, given the quantity of Colombian and Mexican drugs money believed to be sheltered there – to name just one part of the problem.

Now, via Mark Morris, a list of conditions that Panama wants to impose on the international community before it provides any transparency:

“The commitment to the AEOI be developed on the basis of the following principles:

  1. The exchange will be based on bilateral agreements without accepting external pressures regarding which countries should sign agreements;

  2. Absolute reciprocity will be required to exchange information;

  3. There must be equal to the level of all members of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information and financial centers, in order to prevent the AEOI be used as a deterrent to affect the country’s competitiveness for the benefit of other financial institutions;

  4. Existence of legal framework to protect the confidentiality, safe methods to protect the data backup, and to ensure that the information will be used appropriately and only for the purposes specified in agreements that support the AEOI;

  5. Certainty that the countries with which agreements are signed in a position to protect basic guarantees users Panamanian platform services and not exposed to unreasonable risks of political, economic or personal security nature.

  6. Any cooperation should always be in compliance with the fundamental principles of public international law.”

Read those carefully. Morris provides a detailed fisking: our summary would be this: this list is a finger (or two fingers, or a fist and forearm, depending on your cultural background) raised in the general direction of the international community and the rule of law.

Point 3 is a case in point: they won’t give out information until everyone else is fully on board: the devious old “level playing field” argument, which is a recipe for inaction. As Morris puts it:

“In effect, Panama is saying it won’t agree to the CRS until all 130 members of the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes are doing automatic exchange of information. . .  There are 130 members of the OECD Global Forum on Transparency, many of which are developing countries, such as Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Botswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Gabon, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Kenya, Lesotho, Morocco, Niger, Pakistan, Trinidad and Tobago, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda. The Common Reporting Standard does not include developing countries.”

Morris explains, based on established OECD positions, that this intransigence will not be accepted, and blacklisting can’t be far away. Throw the book at ’em.

 

 


Related Posts

UN must defend target to curtail multinational companies’ tax abuse

Photo by Luca Santori, Creative Commons LicenseThe Tax Justice Network, The Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation, and the Global Alliance for Tax Justice call on the UN Secretary General to make sure the commitment to action on tax abuses by multinational companies remains part of the new UN Sustainable Development Goals.

READ MORE →

The BVI: Responsible for worldwide tax losses of $37.5 billion a year

BVI report blogAn extraordinary report by consultants Capital Economics, for BVI Finance, claims that the British Virgin Islands are responsible for $1.5 trillion of assets invested around the world, and that these result in 2.2 million jobs and $15 billion in tax revenue. A better approximation would be that the BVI imposes global tax losses of $37.5 […]

READ MORE →

Event: Making Tax Work for Women in the UK and Globally

Invitation_ Tax and Gender eventOn Wednesday 28th June 2017 at 16.30 our very own Liz Nelson will be speaking at an event in London that aims to bring together gender and tax justice advocates to highlight the need for coherent and gender-responsive fiscal policies to safeguard the rights of women and girls both in the UK and globally. The […]

READ MORE →

Historic event on women, human rights and tax justice in Bogota

BogotaLast week civil society organisations, researchers, labour union activists and policy makers met in Bogota, Colombia to explore how tax justice issues can ensure governments, multinational corporations and others meet their obligations to women in order to secure their full range of human rights. The Women’s Rights and Tax Justice conference opened with a conversation […]

READ MORE →

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

2 thoughts on “Panama thumbs its nose at transparency – again

  1. John Cruddss says:

    Two questions

    1 WHY does the CRS NOT include developing countries ? Surely money can be hidden there as well as anywhere ekse and nature abhirs a vacuum such that it will eventuall be filed.

    2 If Kenya and nuclear power Pakistan are developing countries then why not Panama?

  2. john cruddas says:

    Oh and BTW POINT 2 ABSOLUTE RECIPROCITY.

    THIS MEANS USA HAS TO ” OUT” ITS COSY TAX HAVEN STATES SUCH AS DEKAWARE INDUANA AND WYOMING .

    CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF INCOME AND ITHER TAXES DO EXUST IN THE USA THUS THE POINT REGARDING OTHER STATES NOT HAVING TO RECIPROCATE AS THEY DO NOT KEVY TAXES US SHOT DIWN IN THE US CASE AS IN THAT IF GRIFFIN I E CITY OF LONDON …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top