Austerity: the tax dodgers’ best friend?

   2   0 Blog, Corporate Tax

EPUS taxOne might think that if a government wanted to impose austerity, its appetite for tax collection would rise. But this may not be the case.  Take a look at this study from the European Federation of Public Services Unions (ESPU,) which came out last October but remains relevant. It’s called The Impact of Austerity on Tax Collection: One Year Later and Still Going Backwards. 

And the key point is in the first summarising paragrah:

“A year ago, EPSU produced a report on the impact of austerity on tax collection between 2007 and 2011. It found that despite strong verbal commitments from governments on tackling tax evasion and avoidance, austerity policies meant that the resources to do so were being reduced.

Sadly, the current report shows that little has changed.”

And here are the key details:

“Overall, 24 out of 30 states (EU plus Iceland and Norway) cut employment in tax authorities between 2008 and 2012, and, in the countries where comparable figures are available, a total of 56,865 jobs have been lost. This is equivalent to 9.6% of the 593,000 that were there at the start of the period.
. . .

Two countries, Greece and the UK, cut employment in tax authorities by more than a fifth in four years, and a third, Latvia, cut it by 19.8%. In total 12 countries experienced a loss of more than 10% of jobs in their tax authorities over just four years.”

See more from this from a UK perspective from Tax Research, here, and from Citizens for Tax Justice in the U.S., here.

Tax officials, of course, effectively pay their own salaries, many times over, due to additional tax collected per staff member. Even a blind austerian would admit that these cuts are particularly suspect.

We at TJN are aware that we probably write too much about the UK generally, at the expense of other countries, so here’s a perspective from Spain, which kind of speaks for itself:

Spain austerity tax cuts
This is from the Center for Economic and Social Rights; Gestha is Spain’s Union of Tax Inspectors.

The report is full of details. Its evidence yields another conclusion that may also seem counter-intuitive, but isn’t:

“Europe provides no evidence of a correlation between a high tax ratio and a high rate of tax fraud and avoidance.”

This is what we’ve been saying for a long time. The reflex anti-tax brigade keep saying that the reason for tax evasion and avoidance is high taxes. But why would a corporation or person paying a tax rate of 25 percent be less enthusiastic about avoidance than one paying 30 percent? And how does one explain that the huge explosion in tax avoidance and evasion and illicit financial flows, worldwide, has come amid a huge fall in tax rates on capital and on corporations. There is evidence, which we’ll publish soon, suggesting that the opposite is the case: tax cuts encourage avoidance, for more than just the reasons outlined above.

Are governments right or wrong to pursue austerity policies? Though our members may have personal opinions we aren’t going to venture a TJN opinion on the matter beyond the issues in this blog, because we’re a revenue-side organisation only, and try to refrain from commenting on spending policies.


Related Posts

UN must defend target to curtail multinational companies’ tax abuse

Photo by Luca Santori, Creative Commons LicenseThe Tax Justice Network, The Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation, and the Global Alliance for Tax Justice call on the UN Secretary General to make sure the commitment to action on tax abuses by multinational companies remains part of the new UN Sustainable Development Goals.

READ MORE →

The BVI: Responsible for worldwide tax losses of $37.5 billion a year

BVI report blogAn extraordinary report by consultants Capital Economics, for BVI Finance, claims that the British Virgin Islands are responsible for $1.5 trillion of assets invested around the world, and that these result in 2.2 million jobs and $15 billion in tax revenue. A better approximation would be that the BVI imposes global tax losses of $37.5 […]

READ MORE →

Event: Making Tax Work for Women in the UK and Globally

Invitation_ Tax and Gender eventOn Wednesday 28th June 2017 at 16.30 our very own Liz Nelson will be speaking at an event in London that aims to bring together gender and tax justice advocates to highlight the need for coherent and gender-responsive fiscal policies to safeguard the rights of women and girls both in the UK and globally. The […]

READ MORE →

Historic event on women, human rights and tax justice in Bogota

BogotaLast week civil society organisations, researchers, labour union activists and policy makers met in Bogota, Colombia to explore how tax justice issues can ensure governments, multinational corporations and others meet their obligations to women in order to secure their full range of human rights. The Women’s Rights and Tax Justice conference opened with a conversation […]

READ MORE →

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

2 thoughts on “Austerity: the tax dodgers’ best friend?

  1. Dominic Teagle says:

    Can you expand on this please …

    Cutting HMRC jobs does not automatically result in less tax collected – perhaps collection systems are becoming more efficient requiring fewer staff.

    The important numbers must be around % tax avoided / evaded in an economy, not simply the number of inspectors employed.

    • Nick Shaxson says:

      “Cutting back on money for schools does not necessarily improve education; cutting back on police budgets does not necessarily reduce the effectiveness of policing; cutting the army’s budget won’t hurt its ability to fight wars . . . ” Oh come on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top