George Turner ■ When free speech is criminal
As the global Anti-Corruption Conference begins in this week in Panama City, the case of Dutch citizen Okke Ornstein has hit the headlines. Okke, who lived in Panama was recently jailed on a charge of defamation.
A number of global institutions, such as Transparency International and the International Federation of Journalists have called for Okke’s release. We agree that imprisonment for libel is wrong in principle for reasons we will go into below.
In our work we often focus on financial secrecy. That is secrecy around banking and corporations. However a free press is also fundamental to a well functioning and transparent financial system.
People use offshore financial centers and secrecy jurisdictions to avoid scrutiny. Obviously, if offshore financial centres had large numbers of investigative journalists rooting around in the murky affairs of the individuals that inhabit them, they would lose a lot of their appeal. That is why leaks such as the Panama Papers have been so damaging to the offshore world.
This is also why restrictions on press freedom often go hand in hand http://premier-pharmacy.com/product-category/anti-fungal/ with financial secrecy. These restrictions can come from the government, as can be testified to by David Legge, editor of the Cayman Compass. Last year, after publishing an editorial highlighting the role of his country in the FIFA scandal, he was charged with treason and forced to flee the country. Pressure can also be brought to bare from other sources too. David Marchant, publisher of Offshore Alert, has long been harassed by criminals for his amazing work uncovering fraud and corruption in offshore financial centres.
Put simply, the lack of a free press allows criminals to perpetrate their crimes with impunity, with all of the damage that does to the global financial system and to honest, law abiding citizens around the world.
If Panama seriously wants to leave its tax haven past behind, as well as taking measures to improve financial transparency, it needs to review its laws and criminal processes to ensure they are commensurate with the principle of freedom of speech, which is enshrined in the Panamanian constitution.