John Christensen ■ UK Prime Minister Cameron told: stop Jersey-registered shell company suing Romania in ‘corporate court’

1
Rosia Montana gold mine uses the gold cyanidation technique

Rosia Montana gold mine uses the gold cyanidation technique

A letter (see below) to the UK prime minister signed by TJN and other global justice campaign organisations, calls on David Cameron to stop a Canadian mining company using a Jersey ‘subsidiary’ to sue Romania for halting toxic gold mine, and warns that such cases will balloon under the proposed TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.

A coalition of environmental and human rights organisations from the UK, Romania and Canada have called on prime minister David Cameron to intervene in an international case which is pitting a Canadian mining company against the government of Romania. The group argues that under new trade agreements like TTIP (the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) such cases will radically expand, targeting the British and other European governments.

Mining company Gabriel Resources has filed a request for arbitration at the World Bank after a Romanian court annulled a critical environmental document that was required for the Rosia Montana mine to go-ahead in the Transylvania region of Romania. Part of the request uses a Jersey-listed subsidiary company which campaigners believe is a shell company. Campaigners believe the company is doing this to give it access to a bilateral trade deal between the UK and Romania, under which such corporate cases can be brought.

In a previous interview, the CEO of Gabriel Resources has suggested that they would seek compensation of up to $4 billion if the mine were not to go ahead, despite having spent only a fraction of this amount developing its plans for the mine. According to WHO statistics, Romania’s entire spending on public health for a year is under $8 billion.

The case is an example of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) or ‘corporate courts’ system that has received recent notoriety as a result of their controversial inclusion in the free-trade deal being pushed between the EU and USA, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The letter to Cameron highlights the European Commission’s desire to stop:

“so– called “shell” or “mailbox” companies, owned or controlled by nationals or companies not intended to be protected by the agreement and having no real business activities in the country concerned, to make use of an investment agreement to launch claims before an ISDS tribunal.”

Signatories of the letter, who oppose the use of ISDS in trade agreements, call on Cameron to investigate and call on the court to throw out the case based on the fact that Gabriel doesn’t represent a real British company.

Nick Dearden, the director of Global Justice Now said:

“It’s bad enough that Gabriel Resource’s ‘right to profit’ is being put forward as more important than the government of Romania’s right to act for the benefit of its citizens. It’s even worse that a Canadian mining company is able to do this by exploiting a trade agreement between the UK and Romania based on a shell company it owns in Jersey.

Cheerleaders of TTIP, the toxic trade deal being pushed by the EU and the USA, have accused its many critics of exaggerating the threat that it poses to democracy. But this is a clear example of how we are leaving ourselves vulnerable to an enormous corporate power grab. Why should UK taxpayers foot the massive bills for compensating greedy corporations when the government rules that their operations are harmful to communities or the environment?”

Notes
Gabriel Resources filing request for International Arbitration July 2015
Save Rosia Montana press release on the court case July 2015
According to the World Bank Databank for 2013, Romania’s GDP was $189,639,111,752 while 0.04 of GDP was spent on public healthcare, which comes to $7,585,564,470.08

Full text of the letter to David Cameron and signatories

To: Prime Minister David Cameron MP

Dear Prime Minister

Request for intervention to prevent a Canadian company using British investment treaty to sue Romania

We are deeply concerned that a Canadian mining company called Gabriel Resources has filed a claim against the government of Romania at the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). We believe the company has accused Romania of unfair treatment with regard to its inability to approve Europe’s largest open pit cyanide mine. The project has been faced since its beginning in early 2000 with massive opposition on social, environmental, economic and cultural grounds. These include cyanide tailing waste, the blasting away of four mountains, and relocation of thousands of people.

The locals of Rosia Montana, along with numerous organisations united in the Save Rosia Montana campaign, challenged the legality of key permits, having them permanently annulled by national courts. In 2013 Gabriel Resources attempted to pressure Romania’s government to approve the mine by passing a law through parliament to declare their mine of overriding national interest. This triggered national and international protests which remain to date the biggest social mobilisation in Romania since the fall of communism in 1989.

Many Romanian institutions including the Romanian Geological Institute and Romanian Academy have spoken against the project and its methods.

Furthermore, Investigative journalism indicates a number of alleged illegalities associated with this corporation’s actions in winning the contract for this project. The company has been under investigation in Romania in connection with tax evasion and money laundering.

Two parts of the same corporation have brought this arbitration case, one called Gabriel Resources (Jersey), whose involvement enables the company to utilise the UK-Romania Bilateral Investment Treaty.

In recent campaigns focussing on the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership, we have been given regular assurances by your government that you only support the utilisation of investor State Disputes Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms in ‘legitimate’ cases. it is our understanding that your government agrees with the European Commission’s desire to stop:

“so– called “shell” or “mailbox” companies, owned or controlled by nationals or companies not intended to be protected by the agreement and having no real business activities in the country concerned, to make use of an investment agreement to launch claims before an ISDS tribunal.”

We are concerned that Gabriel Resources (Jersey) does not represent a significant or genuine business interest in the UK, and therefore that any claim launched by that entity should be discounted.

We therefore call on you to
(a) investigate this situation, and if you find evidence that Gabriel Resources (Jersey ) has no real business activities,
(b) present evidence to ICSID that, in your opinion, they should not be covered by the provisions of the UK-Romania agreement.

We look forward to hearing from you further about this matter.

Yours sincerely,
Nick Dearden, Global Justice Now
John Christensen, Tax Justice Network
Tim Jones, Jubilee Debt Campaign
Craig Bennett, Friends of the Earth (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)
Bert Schouwenburg, GMB
Ruth Bergan, Trade Justice Movement
Liz May, Traidcraft Exchange
John Hilary, War on Want
Blanche Jones, 38 Degrees
Emma Hughes, Platform
Richard Solly, London Mining Network

 

Related articles

Comments • 1

  • Bogdan
    August 15, 2016 - 9:56 pm

    Great initiative! One mention: Benjamin Steinmetz it’s the owner of Gabriel Resources.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.