
John Christensen ■ HSBC, money-laundering and Swiss regulatory deterrence

Number-crunching, à la Private Eye: the case of HSBC and its Swiss fine for “organisational deficiencies” in relation to money-laundering.
- $42.8 million Fine imposed on HSBC by Geneva authorities for “organisational deficiencies” related to money-laundering uncovered in #SwissLeaks
- More than $100 billion Amount held in accounts exposed in #SwissLeaks
- 0.04% Fine as a percentage of (revealed) assets under management
- 0.00% Likely deterrent effect
Not all the assets under management were laundered, of course. Far from it, we must hope. But the “organisational deficiencies” – including reassuring clients that no information would reach their home authorities, or using offshore accounts to circumvent disclosure requirements – represent risks that applied to the whole operation.
To put it another way, the fine is about a fifth of the £135 million in tax that HMRC recovered in the UK alone.
Even the prosecutor imposing the fine was embarrassed, and “launched a stinging attack” on the Swiss law that apparently prevented anything within yodeling distance of being a deterrent.
Cross-posted from Uncounted
Related articles

Argentina keeps pushing to be at the vanguard of transparency. Now they need to make more information public

How a mini movement overturned secret US shell companies

Taxing Wall Street: the Tax Justice Network December 2020 podcast

Researcher vacancies at the Tax Justice Network: Latin America and Francophone Africa

The Corporate Tax Haven Index: a Joint Research Centre audit

How to fight inequality: a chat with Ben Phillips

Online Conference: How to Pay for the Climate Transition

Women need real social protection that goes beyond the aspirational

New book provides practical solutions to make tax work to reduce poverty
