Why Infantino’s claims he did nothing wrong are wrong

   0   0 Blog, Corruption


Cross-posted from our partner website The Offshore Game

Infantino’s involvement in a dodgy deal over Champion’s league TV rights are no proof of corruption, but at a minimum they are proof that he is completely unfit to lead FIFA into a new era of transparency and accountability.

Yesterday the latest story in the ongoing Panama Papers scandal hit the internet. Gianni Infantino, the man elected by FIFA to reform the organisation, has been implicated in a highly questionable deal over TV rights, involving some very shady characters.

Infantino claims he has done nothing wrong. He says specifically, “I am dismayed and will not accept that my integrity is being doubted by certain areas of the media, especially given that Uefa has already disclosed in detail all facts regarding these contracts.”

He also claims that although he held the pen on the deals, he was not involved with the tender process. That was done by another company, Team Marketing.

But how do those claims stack up on what we know so far?


Anatomy of a deal

UEFA sold the rights to broadcast Champions League matches in several South American countries to a private company. Nothing wrong with that. Indeed that is how UEFA makes its money.

However, the company they sold the rights to was not a real broadcaster, but a shell company called Cross Trading registered in a tiny island in the pacific. That island, Niue, happens to have one of the most secretive corporate regimes on the planet. Companies set up in Niue are even more secretive than the British Virgin Islands and Panama. It is impossible to find out who owns a company from Niue.

Obviously, Niue, an island of about 1,500 people in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, isn’t a major hub for Latin American broadcasting. Clearly someone wanted to go to extreme lengths to hide who would be the new owner of these lucrative TV rights.

Soon after the rights are sold, the company from Niue sells on the rights to real South American broadcasters who might actually have some use for them. In the process they make a vast overnight profit. Whoever really owns the Niue company, has just got very rich for doing nothing.

Now it turns out that the person behind the company is Hugo Jinkis, who would later be named on the FBI Fifa incitement as being involved in bribery over FIFA media and marketing rights.

Gianni Infantino signed off on the original deal. He claims that he did nothing wrong, and it was impossible to know at the time that Mr Jinkis would later be charged with bribery. He claims that he had no direct involvement in the deal, because UEFA had contracted out the tendering process to a firm called Team Marketing.

After the Guardian published the story, Infantino released a statement that said: “As I previously stated, I never personally dealt with Cross Trading nor their owners as the tender process was conducted by Team Marketing on behalf of Uefa.”


Is it wrong?

Ok – lets assume for a minute that Mr Infantino, when he signed off on the deal, had no idea that he might be dealing with alleged crooks.

  1. Why on earth was UEFA in the game of selling broadcast rights to companies that had no capacity to …… broadcast? Surely this should have raised a whole set of questions that it appears Infantino did not ask?
  2. The way in which the rights were immediately flipped for a huge profits, shows that UEFA was at the very least vastly under-pricing its most valuable commodity. If UEFA were not deliberately under-pricing their goods to allow certain people to profit off a future resale of the rights, they got mugged in a big way. And now we are supposed to trust Infantino to run a multi-billion dollar enterprise? If he isn’t corrupt, he is one of the world’s worst businessmen.
  3. According to the Guardian, Infantino has previously denied any involvement with people under investigation by the FBI, or their companies. That appears to be wrong. Maybe he didn’t know who was behind the Niue companies getting a sweet deal from his organisation, but as their lawyer he really should have.
  4. Although the tender process may have been conducted by “Team Marketing” and not Infantino – Team is a company that Infantino has very close links to. The Offshore Game can reveal that according to the Swiss Federal Register, Infantino become a director of the company in 2007, the year after one of the deals with Cross Trading was signed (the deal was for the 2006-2009 seasons).

Points 1-3 are wrong. And 4 opens up a whole set of new questions. They all may not be illegal, but they raise at least enough questions to start an investigation to see if there was any illegal behaviour.

And does it give anyone confidence that Infantino is the man with the courage and integrity to force through reform? No.

But that was probably a lost cause anyway. Last year, we wrote about how FIFA was structurally incapable of reforming itself, and it is with sadness that we see ourselves being proved right.

The old guard, which either did not question obvious conflicts of interest and corruption risks, or was actively involved, is incapable of grasping the changes that are expected.


Related Posts

Swiss Politicians seek to block automatic exchange of banking information with developing countries

Photo by Pedro SzekelyCould we be seeing a return to the bad old days of Swiss Banking? A right wing party in Switzerland, the Swiss People’s Party, has launched an assault on the automatic exchange of banking information, according to Swiss Daily Newspaper Tages Anzeiger.


The Offshore Wrapper – Data havens and new crackdowns on tax avoidance

Gorgeous Computer FixingsBelow is the text of the offshore wrapper,  a weekly roundup of news from the world of tax justice sent out to our mailing list. If you haven’t signed up yet and would like to receive the wrapper in your inbox every week – you can do so here.


Open data for tax justice – designing a new CbCR database

OD4TJlogoThis week, TJN participated in a design sprint in London organised by Open Knowledge International. The purpose of the sprint was to bring together coders and tax justice advocates to start work on building a database for the new country by country reporting data that we hope will be released in the future, if public […]


New research on key role major economies play in global tax avoidance

offshore-network_colorcorrectedAn important new study on Offshore Financial Centres (OFCs) from the University of Amsterdam has made some fascinating discoveries, challenging, as the Financial Secrecy Index has, the popular misconception that tax havens are only palm fringed little islands and exposing that in fact major economies play a key role in global tax avoidance. Specifically they’ve […]


Launch of international research collaboration, #AltAusterity

alt austerityToday is the launch of #AltAusterity, a new, international research collaboration of which Tax Justice Network is a partner.  The project aims to stimulate public debate on the subject of austerity though high quality research. It is a response to the lack of evidence which has underpinned the current policy agenda on austerity. The project […]


About The Author

John Christensen

Trained as a forensic auditor and economist, he has worked in many countries around the world, including a period of working in offshore financial services with Touche Ross & Co. For 11 years he was economic adviser to the government of the British Channel Island of Jersey. In 2003 he became what the Guardian has described as “the unlikely figurehead of a worldwide campaign against tax avoidance.” His research on offshore finance has been widely published in books and academic journals, and John has taken part in many films, television documentaries and radio programmes.
View all posts by

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top