
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
From Citizens for Tax Justice in the U.S., a post that begins by discussing federal tax breaks for manufacturing corporations. And they ask:
“Tobacco companies “manufacture” cigarettes—but do Americans, or lawmakers, really think it’s a good idea for the federal government to subsidise this activity? New financial reports from major corporations in this sector show that cigarette makers are enjoying substantial manufacturing tax breaks for producing products that kill people.”
It notes that Altria, the maker of Marlboros, cut its federal taxes by $799m over the past years just by using that deduction. (Also see work of our friends at the U.S. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.)
We’d add that Article 6 of the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is clear on the importance of tobacco tax, and this reflects scientific and political consensus on the extreme ativan health costs – that is to say, deaths and lung cancer and other nasties – of not getting it right. Not taxing tobacco consumption sufficiently is one thing: subsidising production (of death) through the manufacturing deduction goes still further in the wrong direction.
This can only be seen as reflecting either very short and myopic policymaker horizons (trading what may or may not produce a job today, for a sure-fire slew of painful deaths tomorrow); or the continuing political power and influence of Big Tobacco: as the WHO puts it: the Tobacco industry is part of the problem, not of the solution. CTJ continue:
“At a minimum, policymakers should be asking whether it makes any sense to subsidize an industry producing products that kill thousands of Americans a year.”
And it’s not just Americans. It’s everyone.
Oh, and there’s this.
And this too.
[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_js]
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
[/vc_raw_js][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

Four definitions to change the world: Struggles over meaning in the UN tax convention negotiations

Fiscal hell or mirage? What Spain’s wage debate gets wrong

Introducing the Real Estate Secrecy Index

Indicator deep dive: Golden Visas

The European Court of Human Rights has upheld the weaponisation of privacy to restrict tax authorities’ access to banking data

She cleans your house but the tax system can’t see her

What we learned from three years of conversations on poverty beyond growth
Q&A on California’s proposed legislation on Worldwide Combined Reporting (WWCR)
27 May 2026

California steps up for tax fairness



