New Christian Aid poll: 70% believe ‘legal’ tax avoidance is wrong

   1   0 Blog, Tax and corporate responsibility

Christian AidFrom Business World in Ireland:

“Only 36% of people trust multinational companies to provide accurate tax information, while 70% believe multinational tax avoidance schemes to be morally wrong even if they are legal according to a new . . . survey, conducted on behalf of the charity Christian Aid. According to the poll, Ireland’s international reputation also suffers as a consequence of our tax policy.”

Here is the Christian Aid press release:

70% of people believe tax avoidance by multinationals to be morally wrong – even if considered legal – Christian Aid Poll [TJN adds: a lot of what get called ‘tax avoidance’ isn’t necessarily legal: see here.]

• Only 36% of Irish people trust the information multinationals provide about their tax payments in Ireland.

• Over three quarters (76%) believe more detailed reporting of companies’ activities would show if companies were paying the correct amount of tax.

• ‘New poll will add to the pressure on government to support efforts in EU to introduce a country by country reporting requirement for multinationals’, according to Christian Aid.

A new RED C survey, conducted on behalf of the charity Christian Aid, shows that only 36% of people trust multinational companies to provide accurate tax information, while 70% of people believe multinational tax avoidance schemes to be morally wrong even if they are legal.

And over three quarters (76%) of people believe that greater transparency around the activities of multinationals would be useful in determining whether they are paying the correct amount of tax.

According to the poll, Ireland’s international reputation also suffers as a consequence of our tax policy with less than 30% of people believing Ireland’s international standing is unaffected by our tax policy.

Sorley McCaughey Head of Advocacy at Christian Aid said, ‘We think the findings are fairly damning of the tax practices of multinationals, although not surprising. Scandals like Lux Leaks demonstrate that while PAYE workers, and Small and Medium Enterprises pay top rates of tax, some multinationals get away with paying next to nothing. What galls people is that Irish tax policy has been key to multinationals successfully avoiding the payment of vast sums of tax.’

‘What makes matters considerably worse, is that these same schemes in which Ireland is a key player is almost certainly depriving developing countries of millions of euros in taxable revenue that should be spent on essential services like health and education.’

Mr. McCaughey also pointed to overwhelming support for greater transparency in the reporting of multinationals, with 76% of people believing that if companies had to report on the full range of their activities in each of the jurisdictions in which they operate, it would be easier to see if they were paying the right amount of tax.

‘We believe the poll confirms that companies and the Irish government are out of synch with the Irish public in the level of transparency that companies should be asked to provide.

‘People want to hold companies to account, and they want to do that by knowing exactly how much companies pay in tax, how much profit they record and all the other details of their operations in each of the countries in which they operate.

‘Essentially what the public are calling for is a form of public country by country reporting, something that is being debated in Brussels at the moment.

‘Regrettably the Irish government opposes public country by country reporting, but our view is that this poll shows that they are badly out of step with the public on this one.

‘The reputational damage that Ireland is suffering, could be mitigated by the government taking a leading role in Brussels in ensuring the introduction of public country by country reporting. It’s a real opportunity for Ireland to show real commitment to the highest levels of corporate transparency.’

The introduction of public country by country reporting is currently being negotiated as part of the European Shareholders Rights Directive. The European Parliament has already voted overwhelmingly in favour of public country by country reporting, and over the coming months, negotiations will begin between the Parliament, European Commission and Member states. Negotiations on this recommenced on September 14th.

A year ago, the European Commission and PricewaterhouseCoopers conducted an impact assessment of public country by country reporting for the financial sector under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV.  The conclusion was that disclosing country by country reporting information ‘was unlikely to have a significant negative economic impact, and could have a small positive economic impact’. Following this finding, public country by country reporting was introduced for multinational corporations in the financial sector, which now serves as an example how such a policy can work.


For further information contact Barry Turley on 0044 7734 256318, or Sorley McCaughey at 087-0620062

The RED C poll was conducted between June 22-24, with a nationally representative sample of 1007 adults aged 18+ across the Republic of Ireland.

This provides a margin of error of +/- 3%, the same used for political polling.

Related Posts

UN must defend target to curtail multinational companies’ tax abuse

Photo by Luca Santori, Creative Commons LicenseThe Tax Justice Network, The Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation, and the Global Alliance for Tax Justice call on the UN Secretary General to make sure the commitment to action on tax abuses by multinational companies remains part of the new UN Sustainable Development Goals.


The BVI: Responsible for worldwide tax losses of $37.5 billion a year

BVI report blogAn extraordinary report by consultants Capital Economics, for BVI Finance, claims that the British Virgin Islands are responsible for $1.5 trillion of assets invested around the world, and that these result in 2.2 million jobs and $15 billion in tax revenue. A better approximation would be that the BVI imposes global tax losses of $37.5 […]


Event: Making Tax Work for Women in the UK and Globally

Invitation_ Tax and Gender eventOn Wednesday 28th June 2017 at 16.30 our very own Liz Nelson will be speaking at an event in London that aims to bring together gender and tax justice advocates to highlight the need for coherent and gender-responsive fiscal policies to safeguard the rights of women and girls both in the UK and globally. The […]


Historic event on women, human rights and tax justice in Bogota

BogotaLast week civil society organisations, researchers, labour union activists and policy makers met in Bogota, Colombia to explore how tax justice issues can ensure governments, multinational corporations and others meet their obligations to women in order to secure their full range of human rights. The Women’s Rights and Tax Justice conference opened with a conversation […]


The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]


One thought on “New Christian Aid poll: 70% believe ‘legal’ tax avoidance is wrong

  1. Robert Watson says:

    Where and to what extent do the subcontracting companies replacing public service and affiliated employees pay taxes in the UK? If they do not how is the “profit” transfer made and where do they pay tax?

    Are the accounts of sub-contractor companies in the public services sectors monitored and taken into account in the acceptance of tenders and contracts or the equivalent?

    If not this could obviously falsify the comparison between public and private business and industrial companies tax contributions to the domestic national exchequer and those by the finance sector. Country by country reporting should in principal include similar companies as they have a direct impact both on the home country’s tax base and public service employment.

    What is the situation when (anonymous) shell companies are used as intermediaries?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top