New Christian Aid poll: 70% believe ‘legal’ tax avoidance is wrong

   1   0 Blog, Tax and corporate responsibility

Christian AidFrom Business World in Ireland:

“Only 36% of people trust multinational companies to provide accurate tax information, while 70% believe multinational tax avoidance schemes to be morally wrong even if they are legal according to a new . . . survey, conducted on behalf of the charity Christian Aid. According to the poll, Ireland’s international reputation also suffers as a consequence of our tax policy.”

Here is the Christian Aid press release:

70% of people believe tax avoidance by multinationals to be morally wrong – even if considered legal – Christian Aid Poll [TJN adds: a lot of what get called ‘tax avoidance’ isn’t necessarily legal: see here.]

• Only 36% of Irish people trust the information multinationals provide about their tax payments in Ireland.

• Over three quarters (76%) believe more detailed reporting of companies’ activities would show if companies were paying the correct amount of tax.

• ‘New poll will add to the pressure on government to support efforts in EU to introduce a country by country reporting requirement for multinationals’, according to Christian Aid.

A new RED C survey, conducted on behalf of the charity Christian Aid, shows that only 36% of people trust multinational companies to provide accurate tax information, while 70% of people believe multinational tax avoidance schemes to be morally wrong even if they are legal.

And over three quarters (76%) of people believe that greater transparency around the activities of multinationals would be useful in determining whether they are paying the correct amount of tax.

According to the poll, Ireland’s international reputation also suffers as a consequence of our tax policy with less than 30% of people believing Ireland’s international standing is unaffected by our tax policy.

Sorley McCaughey Head of Advocacy at Christian Aid said, ‘We think the findings are fairly damning of the tax practices of multinationals, although not surprising. Scandals like Lux Leaks demonstrate that while PAYE workers, and Small and Medium Enterprises pay top rates of tax, some multinationals get away with paying next to nothing. What galls people is that Irish tax policy has been key to multinationals successfully avoiding the payment of vast sums of tax.’

‘What makes matters considerably worse, is that these same schemes in which Ireland is a key player is almost certainly depriving developing countries of millions of euros in taxable revenue that should be spent on essential services like health and education.’

Mr. McCaughey also pointed to overwhelming support for greater transparency in the reporting of multinationals, with 76% of people believing that if companies had to report on the full range of their activities in each of the jurisdictions in which they operate, it would be easier to see if they were paying the right amount of tax.

‘We believe the poll confirms that companies and the Irish government are out of synch with the Irish public in the level of transparency that companies should be asked to provide.

‘People want to hold companies to account, and they want to do that by knowing exactly how much companies pay in tax, how much profit they record and all the other details of their operations in each of the countries in which they operate.

‘Essentially what the public are calling for is a form of public country by country reporting, something that is being debated in Brussels at the moment.

‘Regrettably the Irish government opposes public country by country reporting, but our view is that this poll shows that they are badly out of step with the public on this one.

‘The reputational damage that Ireland is suffering, could be mitigated by the government taking a leading role in Brussels in ensuring the introduction of public country by country reporting. It’s a real opportunity for Ireland to show real commitment to the highest levels of corporate transparency.’

The introduction of public country by country reporting is currently being negotiated as part of the European Shareholders Rights Directive. The European Parliament has already voted overwhelmingly in favour of public country by country reporting, and over the coming months, negotiations will begin between the Parliament, European Commission and Member states. Negotiations on this recommenced on September 14th.

A year ago, the European Commission and PricewaterhouseCoopers conducted an impact assessment of public country by country reporting for the financial sector under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV.  The conclusion was that disclosing country by country reporting information ‘was unlikely to have a significant negative economic impact, and could have a small positive economic impact’. Following this finding, public country by country reporting was introduced for multinational corporations in the financial sector, which now serves as an example how such a policy can work.


For further information contact Barry Turley on 0044 7734 256318, or Sorley McCaughey at 087-0620062

The RED C poll was conducted between June 22-24, with a nationally representative sample of 1007 adults aged 18+ across the Republic of Ireland.

This provides a margin of error of +/- 3%, the same used for political polling.

Related Posts

Swiss Politicians seek to block automatic exchange of banking information with developing countries

Photo by Pedro SzekelyCould we be seeing a return to the bad old days of Swiss Banking? A right wing party in Switzerland, the Swiss People’s Party, has launched an assault on the automatic exchange of banking information, according to Swiss Daily Newspaper Tages Anzeiger.


The Offshore Wrapper – Data havens and new crackdowns on tax avoidance

Gorgeous Computer FixingsBelow is the text of the offshore wrapper,  a weekly roundup of news from the world of tax justice sent out to our mailing list. If you haven’t signed up yet and would like to receive the wrapper in your inbox every week – you can do so here.


Open data for tax justice – designing a new CbCR database

OD4TJlogoThis week, TJN participated in a design sprint in London organised by Open Knowledge International. The purpose of the sprint was to bring together coders and tax justice advocates to start work on building a database for the new country by country reporting data that we hope will be released in the future, if public […]


New research on key role major economies play in global tax avoidance

offshore-network_colorcorrectedAn important new study on Offshore Financial Centres (OFCs) from the University of Amsterdam has made some fascinating discoveries, challenging, as the Financial Secrecy Index has, the popular misconception that tax havens are only palm fringed little islands and exposing that in fact major economies play a key role in global tax avoidance. Specifically they’ve […]


Launch of international research collaboration, #AltAusterity

alt austerityToday is the launch of #AltAusterity, a new, international research collaboration of which Tax Justice Network is a partner.  The project aims to stimulate public debate on the subject of austerity though high quality research. It is a response to the lack of evidence which has underpinned the current policy agenda on austerity. The project […]


About The Author

Nicholas Shaxson is a journalist and writer on the staff of Tax Justice Network. He is author of the book Poisoned Wells about the oil industry in Africa, published in 2007, and the more recent Treasure Islands: Tax havens and the Men who Stole the World, published by Random House in January 2011. He lives in Berlin
View all posts by

One thought on “New Christian Aid poll: 70% believe ‘legal’ tax avoidance is wrong

  1. Robert Watson says:

    Where and to what extent do the subcontracting companies replacing public service and affiliated employees pay taxes in the UK? If they do not how is the “profit” transfer made and where do they pay tax?

    Are the accounts of sub-contractor companies in the public services sectors monitored and taken into account in the acceptance of tenders and contracts or the equivalent?

    If not this could obviously falsify the comparison between public and private business and industrial companies tax contributions to the domestic national exchequer and those by the finance sector. Country by country reporting should in principal include similar companies as they have a direct impact both on the home country’s tax base and public service employment.

    What is the situation when (anonymous) shell companies are used as intermediaries?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top