Norwegian Parliament votes for public registry of ownership

   0   1 Blog, Secrecy



Guest blog from Sigrid Klæboe Jacobsen of TJN Norway

On the 5th of June, a unanimous Norwegian Parliament voted for establishing a beneficial ownership registry.

Some background: Last year the Parliament voted to establish a publicly available shareholders registry, but not on beneficial owners. Foreigners shareholders were still allowed to invest anonymously through «nominee accounts». The Norwegian Central Registry for Companies (Brønnøysundregistrene) issued a report where they suggested what the new registry should look like. But in the report they suggested serious restrictions to whom should access the information, and restrictions on searching functionality.

This got journalists, academics, NGOs and a lot others furious. In the mean time, FATF also issues a report evaluating Norways efforts combating money laundering. They concluded that Norway had serious weaknesses, especially in that they did not ensure information about the real owners of foreign owners in a timely manner.

The debate that followed, culiminated in two Parliamentary members making a proposal to make sure that the new registry really would be a registry of beneficial owners with real access for the public. The text was even more strengthend in the comments made by a unanimous Finance Committee in Parliament on the 28 of May.

The approve text includes both the proposal from the two parliamentarians and the comments from the Finance Committe. The text instructs the Ministry of Finance on the directions the new registry should take.

Here are exerpts from the text that Parliament approved.

Foreign owners can invest through the so-called nominee accounts, and so hide the true owner’s identity. Review of foreign shareholdings shows that over half are registered precisely through nominee accounts. Many are represented by managers who are known for extensive secrecy, as banks in Switzerland and Luxembourg.

The proposers will emphasize the importance of that the public has effective access to information about ownership. Companies should be able to investigate who they do business with, and disclosures in the media about reprehensible economic conditions often come after tips from individuals or organizations.

It should establish a system for verification, control and possible sanctions if registry requirements are not complied with.

The Committee notes the proposals-makers’ contention that transparency of ownership and corporate structures have proven to be very important in the fight against tax crime, corruption and money laundering. In addition, the Committee considers transparency in ownership of companies is an important contribution to an effective and adaptable capital.

A growing international acceptance of the need for transparency across national borders, and acceptance of the different countries’ tax and police authorities must be able to collaborate seamlessly, providing room for hope that the transparency of ownership can be better internationally and thus also in countries outside Norway. The Committee believes this could be an important modernization of an effective international market economy. It will also provide a better opportunity for the general public transparency and control.

The definition of “beneficial owners” must be at a level that allows Norway to still stand out as a pioneer when it comes to transparency about the ownership question.

The Committee also notes that Tax Justice Network – Norway in cooperation with a number of other organizations are investigating alternative ways to establish a Norwegian owner registration. The Committee expects that the Government will await this report and consider the solutions that emerge in this work in on equal footing with the report issued by Brønnøysund Central Registry.

The Committee points out that achieving the greatest possible transparency in these issues will help to protect the economic system that has been built up in Norway.

The committee will not dissuade the nominee registration may still be available in Norway, in line with the practical arrangements that exist in our neighboring countries. However, it is a prerequisite for such registration that the company itself, and authorities who need it and the public, at any time can get information about the underlying owners. The transparency and openness in the nominee accounts should be as similar as possible to the transparency which will now will be established for the new register for Norwegian shareholders.

ALL RELEVANT DOCUMENTS available in Norwegian here


Related Posts

New research on key role major economies play in global tax avoidance

offshore-network_colorcorrectedAn important new study on Offshore Financial Centres (OFCs) from the University of Amsterdam has made some fascinating discoveries, challenging, as the Financial Secrecy Index has, the popular misconception that tax havens are only palm fringed little islands and exposing that in fact major economies play a key role in global tax avoidance. Specifically they’ve […]


Launch of international research collaboration, #AltAusterity

alt austerityToday is the launch of #AltAusterity, a new, international research collaboration of which Tax Justice Network is a partner.  The project aims to stimulate public debate on the subject of austerity though high quality research. It is a response to the lack of evidence which has underpinned the current policy agenda on austerity. The project […]


RB tax avoidance – company calls for public country by country reporting after Oxfam report reveals profit shifting

pictureOxfam has today released a report on tax dodging by RB, the company formerly known as Reckitt Benckiser and the maker of thousands of well known household products. The report looks at the 2012 restructuring of the company which saw it set up ‘hubs’ in the Netherlands, Dubai and Singapore, all well known corporate tax […]


Half measures mean Mauritius will continue to be a tax haven for the developing world

MauritiusThere was news this week that Mauritius has signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI). This is an initiative from the OECD to allow countries to take measures designed to stop tax avoidance by multinational companies and put them into their existing network of […]


G20: Pressure rising on tax haven USA

HamburgWhilst the eyes of the world focused on the isolation of the US from the ‘G19’ position on climate change, something remarkable played out elsewhere in the process. Following closely the common EU position that we highlighted a few days ago, the G20 communique devotes important space to tax justice. It’s so good we quote […]


About The Author

John Christensen

Trained as a forensic auditor and economist, he has worked in many countries around the world, including a period of working in offshore financial services with Touche Ross & Co. For 11 years he was economic adviser to the government of the British Channel Island of Jersey. In 2003 he became what the Guardian has described as “the unlikely figurehead of a worldwide campaign against tax avoidance.” His research on offshore finance has been widely published in books and academic journals, and John has taken part in many films, television documentaries and radio programmes.
View all posts by

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top