Via Martin Hearson, who has done a useful new blog on Uganda’s tax treaties entitled Uganda’s tax treaties: a legal and historical analysis. The article is by Mr. Hearson (of the London School of Economics) and Jalia Kangave of the East African School of Taxation.
For aficionados of tax and developing countries his post is well worth looking at in its entirety; we’ll just paste a few choice quotes here.
The present system of tax agreements creates the anomaly of aid in reverse – from poor to rich countries
Charles Irish, 1974
The ones claiming [reduced taxation] under the DTAs [Double Tax Agreements] are many, about one per day. The worst culprits are Mauritius, Netherlands. There is a lot of treaty shopping. A lot of companies trading in Uganda have their HQs in Mauritius.
An unnamed Uganda Revenue Authority official
In treaties between developing and developed countries . . . re-allocating tax revenues means regressive redistribution – to the benefit of the developed countries at the expense of the developing ones.
Tsilly Dagan, 2000
“Most of the time developing countries are disadvantaged by treaties. Treaties do not attract investment. It is other factors. . . . I know there’s empirical evidence that it [a treaty] has no effect on investment, but the reality country-to-country is that there’s a bluff that goes on, and countries don’t want to take the risk of losing big investments.”
Unnamed African treaty negotiator
When you sign an OECD model treaty, you say there is no withholding, or hardly any withholding, on outflows of cash to multinationals. Now why in hell do you want to sign that?
Lee Sheppard, 2013
The evidence that tax treaties attract new FDI into developing countries is inconclusive at best . . . most of the academic literature on tax treaties and developing countries consists of:
– Econometric papers often making herculean assumptions
– Legal papers that do not always consider realities “on the ground”
Martin Hearson
And there is plenty more good stuff where those came from.
See more about tax treaties here, and more background about Uganda’s treaties here.
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources

The European Court of Justice strikes against transparency again. Our response should be to call for an end to corporate limited liability
Report of the Fifth Session of negotiations on the UN tax convention
4 September 2026
Submission to Workstream I on Co-Lead’s Zero Draft of UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation (post-Fifth Session)
28 August 2026
Submission to Workstream II on Taxation of Income from Cross-Border Services (post-Fifth Session)
26 August 2026
Strengthening public resource mobilization through tax justice
25 August 2026
Submission to Workstream III on Dispute Prevention and Resolution (post-Fifth Session)
24 August 2026

From data to policy: Building Africa’s evidence ecosystem for better tax reform

New IMF AML Guidance pushes for beneficial ownership transparency and tackles risks from major financial centres

When measurement is political: Accounting for natural resources and the true location of sales under unitary taxation
A 500-billion-dollar decision for the world: the revenue impacts of global unitary taxation
2 August 2026
And you can find the full analysis on Uganda here http://www.actionaid.org/uganda/publications/double-taxation-treaties-uganda-impact-and-policy-implications
Thanks. We already have this on our tax treaties page, but I will update the blog with this too.
tax not people’s efforts, tax privilege (like land and patents).. :)
http://vimeo.com/38500767
Comments are closed.