KPMG offers generous advice that will help tax cheats

KPMG CRSOne of the most important live initiatives currently in the field of tax justice and international financial transparency is the OECD’s Common Reporting Standards (CRS,) a system of automatic information exchange which we have broadly welcomed – though with some gripes – here.

Now it turns out that KPMG, that avuncular global accounting and “professional services” giant, is monitoring the CRS and its moves towards better financial transparency, and in a long document is offering this to its clients:

“KPMG can help you transition to the new standards”

So far, so benign. It’s surely going to provide a lot of nuts-and-bolts transition fixes for firms and individuals that would be too difficult and costly to learn about and implement on their own. Again, which is fine.

But then we get to something different. What, precisely, does this next bit mean?

“financial institutions should consider introducing policies for account holders that may wish to move their accounts to a non-CRS country.” (p21)

The only reasonable way we can think of to interpret this is that KPMG is urging (note that “should consider” is not a neutral term) financial institutions to facilitate the evasion of global standards and the preservation of secrecy – moves that are all but guaranteed to abet tax evasion and other crimes.

They, along with the other Big Four accountants, certainly have a long history of doing just that.

There’s more. :

“Financial institutions should . . .participate in relevant domestic lobbying groups to influence rules.”

KPMG is urging the financial sector to do more lobbying than it already does?

And they are boasting, no less, about the revolving door that helps influence policy – and about their own lobbying and influence:

“Our AEoI team includes former US government professionals that helped develop IGA model agreements and negotiated bilateral IGAs, and have drafted US regulatory guidance under FATCA, as well as helping draft the CRS. Professionals from across KPMG’s global network are also in regular dialogue with the US IRS and other tax authorities (e.g. UK’s HMRC) that are involved with drafting FATCA and IGA implementing guidance.”

As if these companies didn’t have enough influence already.


Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]

READ MORE →

Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.

READ MORE →

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]

READ MORE →

Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top