UK-Swiss tax receipts slow to a trickle

   0   0 Blog, Enablers and intermediaries, Secrecy

Way back then, when Britain and Switzerland had just signed a new so-called “Rubik” tax deal promising to “regularise untaxed assets”, the UK government was promising that the deal would reap £4-7 billion. OK, many people in Britain thought: it was rather corrupt and offensive, but that was a lot of money.

Eager tax advisers, aware of the lucrative advisory fees that might come in from the deal, began briefing journalists about what a great deal it was for Britain.

We didn’t like it one little bit, of course, for all these reasons – and another one. Here is what we predicted: the upper limit to revenues for the deal were £1 billion, and would likely come in at much less than that. 

We sent our analysis to a number of newspapers at the time – not to mention the UK tax authorities, several private tax advisers, the Swiss tax authorities, the Swiss Bankers’ association, and several others – but none of them, bar a few honourable exceptions, paid any attention. All aboard the gravy train!

Well, yesterday we got sent an update of the figures (thanks Bruno!) from the Swiss tax administration, which shows that Britain earned £1 million (with an ‘m’ in August, for a grand total £470 million (with an ‘m’) since the deal was signed.

So we were even generous to the Swiss deal: it was even worse than we thought – less than a tenth of what the UK authorities had predicted.

We know, we know, we’ve made this point before. But it’s nice to get the updates, at least – and we did put in an awful lot of work for that report, so we’ll milk it.

We recently learned from the UK magazine Private Eye that the UK authorities were seeking to re-negotiate the useless and corrupt deal. We still don’t know anything new about that: we haven’t received a response to our letter.



Related Posts

Launch of international research collaboration, #AltAusterity

alt austerityToday is the launch of #AltAusterity, a new, international research collaboration of which Tax Justice Network is a partner.  The project aims to stimulate public debate on the subject of austerity though high quality research. It is a response to the lack of evidence which has underpinned the current policy agenda on austerity. The project […]


RB tax avoidance – company calls for public country by country reporting after Oxfam report reveals profit shifting

pictureOxfam has today released a report on tax dodging by RB, the company formerly known as Reckitt Benckiser and the maker of thousands of well known household products. The report looks at the 2012 restructuring of the company which saw it set up ‘hubs’ in the Netherlands, Dubai and Singapore, all well known corporate tax […]


Half measures mean Mauritius will continue to be a tax haven for the developing world

MauritiusThere was news this week that Mauritius has signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI). This is an initiative from the OECD to allow countries to take measures designed to stop tax avoidance by multinational companies and put them into their existing network of […]


G20: Pressure rising on tax haven USA

HamburgWhilst the eyes of the world focused on the isolation of the US from the ‘G19’ position on climate change, something remarkable played out elsewhere in the process. Following closely the common EU position that we highlighted a few days ago, the G20 communique devotes important space to tax justice. It’s so good we quote […]


Will the G20 ever end the global problem of tax avoidance and tax evasion?

HamburgAhead of the G20 Summit in Hamburg this week our own George Turner has published this op-ed in the German newspaper Die Tageszeitung today. The article discusses why, despite sustained political engagement from world leaders, we are still some way from solving the problem of tax avoidance and tax evasion. Here’s an English translation of the article:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top