UK-Swiss tax receipts slow to a trickle

   0   0 Blog, Enablers and intermediaries, Secrecy

Way back then, when Britain and Switzerland had just signed a new so-called “Rubik” tax deal promising to “regularise untaxed assets”, the UK government was promising that the deal would reap £4-7 billion. OK, many people in Britain thought: it was rather corrupt and offensive, but that was a lot of money.

Eager tax advisers, aware of the lucrative advisory fees that might come in from the deal, began briefing journalists about what a great deal it was for Britain.

We didn’t like it one little bit, of course, for all these reasons – and another one. Here is what we predicted: the upper limit to revenues for the deal were £1 billion, and would likely come in at much less than that. 

We sent our analysis to a number of newspapers at the time – not to mention the UK tax authorities, several private tax advisers, the Swiss tax authorities, the Swiss Bankers’ association, and several others – but none of them, bar a few honourable exceptions, paid any attention. All aboard the gravy train!

Well, yesterday we got sent an update of the figures (thanks Bruno!) from the Swiss tax administration, which shows that Britain earned £1 million (with an ‘m’ in August, for a grand total £470 million (with an ‘m’) since the deal was signed.

So we were even generous to the Swiss deal: it was even worse than we thought – less than a tenth of what the UK authorities had predicted.

We know, we know, we’ve made this point before. But it’s nice to get the updates, at least – and we did put in an awful lot of work for that report, so we’ll milk it.

We recently learned from the UK magazine Private Eye that the UK authorities were seeking to re-negotiate the useless and corrupt deal. We still don’t know anything new about that: we haven’t received a response to our letter.



Related Posts

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]


Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]


Is tax avoidance at the heart of Ireland’s economic miracle?

AIB International Finance Centre Dublin - By Estoy Aquí (Own work) [GFDL ( or CC BY 3.0 (], via Wikimedia CommonsComing out of the economic crisis Ireland was one of the best performing economies, with GDP growth rates of 8.5% in 2014 and an extraordinary 26.3% in 2015. But how much of this economic activity was real, and how much a fiction created by Ireland’s tax haven status? A new paper by Heike Joebges of the University […]


New Report: HMRC’s “Building our Future” programme

bigben-mcbigbenfaceYesterday the Tax Justice Network was in the UK Parliament to launch a report it co-produced with the Public and Commercial Services Union. The report, entitled “HMRC, Building an Uncertain Future” is a study of HMRC’s (the UK tax authority) reform plans which it is calling “Building our Future”. The report published yesterday analysed the […]


Financial secrecy in football: time for action

bigben-mcbigbenfaceEveryone has known for years that football is rotten to the core and financial secrecy is at the heart of the problem. Why then is no one doing anything about it? This post from the Offshore Game project originally features in the Independent. 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top