Guest blog from Isle of Man: To be, or not to be, a tax haven?

   0   0 Blog

Isle of ManA guest blog by Cat Turner, author and campaigner based in the Isle of Man.

“To be, or not to be, a tax haven”

As a campaigner for social and environmental justice, I’ve been following with interest the recent debates on whether we on the Isle of Man are – in fact – a ‘tax haven’. The debate’s rumbled around for decades, of course, pretty much ever since the gazes of the UK EU, US and OECD, began focusing on their various perspectives of harmful tax practices.

Over the years, it’s been entertaining listening to our government leaders contorting themselves, and the English language, to show the world why we’re not. For example, we can’t be one because unlike the stereotypical palm-fringed candidate, we do have VAT, we do have income taxes, we don’t have explicit secrecy legislation, or we don’t have the high levels of average per capita net wealth often associated with havens. Take your pick: there are these, and plenty more.

And of course the Manx government’s spokespeople are quick to take the stage and explain what good news it is that we’ve received this or that plaudit from an international agency, for leading from the front in terms of ‘compliance with international standards’ or for being an early signatory to various sets of transparency and information exchange standards.

And these factors are all important – they make a difference, and each is usually a hard won battle.  However, they’re also very incomplete barometers of our status. As someone who’s worked for 30 years in the Manx finance sector, variously in regulation and policy, and at board level for significant financial institutions, I’ve watched – indeed, taken part in – innumerable discussions as to how the Island’s finance sector can be protected and grown over the years.

At the time, I believed I was party to something laudable – after all, creating jobs, growing the economy…what’s not to like?

And at the level of individual financial organisations, these discussions often focussed on how a given product or structure could be ever more useful for its clients, for example by ‘protecting’ or ‘sheltering’ their capital from taxes that would otherwise be paid on their deaths, or some other event.

Protection; shelter; such benign sounding words, aren’t they?  Who could feel ashamed of spending their working day in such a praiseworthy, responsible quest?

But over time, I found my own experience became less exalting. What I found was that in developing new products or ‘planning vehicles’, I was able – indeed encouraged – to propose choices that were artificial in the extreme.

“What if we call it [a payment stream] a dividend instead of salary?”

“What if we get the clients to be guarantors instead of owners?”

“What if they take the money out as a loan instead?”

These and many other questions get regularly kicked around by people in the offshore planning industry, looking to re-characterise their clients, or their clients’ wealth, in ways that will enable them to cut their tax bills.

But surely – surely, if electing the way in which you’re characterised is purely an optional choice, it’s also a fiction – no matter how much expensive ‘structuring’ you then put in place to shore up perceptions of what you’re doing.

It was this realisation, among others, that finally made me accept that the offshore financial services industry was no longer for me. Not because I suddenly became a ‘good person’ (I’m not, particularly, but I do my best) – but because a living earned on a lie is no living at all.

And once this realisation had dawned, and as I began to listen for ‘double-speak’ that organisations and their staff routinely use to avoid ‘mis-characterising’ their activities as avoidance, the more I knew it was time for a change in direction.

Endnote: see also our report on the Isle of Man for the Financial Secrecy Index. For more background on how tax havens like to portray themselves, see our tag ‘theatre of probity.’



Related Posts

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]


Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]


Is tax avoidance at the heart of Ireland’s economic miracle?

AIB International Finance Centre Dublin - By Estoy Aquí (Own work) [GFDL ( or CC BY 3.0 (], via Wikimedia CommonsComing out of the economic crisis Ireland was one of the best performing economies, with GDP growth rates of 8.5% in 2014 and an extraordinary 26.3% in 2015. But how much of this economic activity was real, and how much a fiction created by Ireland’s tax haven status? A new paper by Heike Joebges of the University […]


New Report: HMRC’s “Building our Future” programme

bigben-mcbigbenfaceYesterday the Tax Justice Network was in the UK Parliament to launch a report it co-produced with the Public and Commercial Services Union. The report, entitled “HMRC, Building an Uncertain Future” is a study of HMRC’s (the UK tax authority) reform plans which it is calling “Building our Future”. The report published yesterday analysed the […]


Financial secrecy in football: time for action

bigben-mcbigbenfaceEveryone has known for years that football is rotten to the core and financial secrecy is at the heart of the problem. Why then is no one doing anything about it? This post from the Offshore Game project originally features in the Independent. 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top