Big Four firms officially sell out Hong Kong’s democracy movement

   0   0 Blog, Enablers and intermediaries

Updated with commentary from the Financial Times and Bloomberg: see below

CNBC is reporting:

“As a pro-democracy movement gains steam in Hong Kong, some worry the campaign could hurt the city’s competitiveness and rattle its financial market.”

One could unpack that short sentence and probably find five or ten nonsenses and fallacies coiled up inside it. So democracy is the enemy of ‘competitiveness,’ is it? In that case, what is the meaning or the point of ‘competitiveness,’ if it stands against the wishes of the people it is supposed to benefit? Pray do tell, CNBC.

As we have remarked before, competitiveness, at least as most politicians and pundits understand it, is a completely misunderstood, ridiculous concept. See this in the tax area, here, and more generally via the Finance Curse too.

But our main point here is to point to a little tweet.

Update: The FT has now covered this story. Good for them. They say:

“The big four global accounting companies have taken out press advertisements in Hong Kong stating they are “opposed” to the territory’s democracy movement, warning that their multinational clients may quit the city if activists carry out their threats to disrupt business with street protests.
. . .
“Prem Sikka, accountancy professor at the University of Essex, said the advertisements “showed the big four’s true colours”. “It’s utterly unwise and outrageous. People have a right to protest,” he said.”

The FT has a full translation under the article, in which the Big Four use that ‘competitiveness’ weasel word:

“Hong Kong’s competitiveness will be further lessened.”

Bloomberg is more pointed in its headline, in an article headlined Big Four sell out Hong Kong:

“Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement better hope it never needs an accountant in Hong Kong because, as of this morning, the Big Four audit firms have gone on the record in opposition to it.”

This is just one more example to demonstrate the rottenness at the heart of the global accountancy profession.  

We have often pointed out how Big Four accountancy firms stand against democracy, in their service of Big Finance and the wealthiest members of society. “Competitiveness” is one of their favourite words.

Background about how Hong Kong became a tax haven, here.


Related Posts

Is tax avoidance at the heart of Ireland’s economic miracle?

AIB International Finance Centre Dublin - By Estoy Aquí (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsComing out of the economic crisis Ireland was one of the best performing economies, with GDP growth rates of 8.5% in 2014 and an extraordinary 26.3% in 2015. But how much of this economic activity was real, and how much a fiction created by Ireland’s tax haven status? A new paper by Heike Joebges of the University […]

READ MORE →

New Report: HMRC’s “Building our Future” programme

bigben-mcbigbenfaceYesterday the Tax Justice Network was in the UK Parliament to launch a report it co-produced with the Public and Commercial Services Union. The report, entitled “HMRC, Building an Uncertain Future” is a study of HMRC’s (the UK tax authority) reform plans which it is calling “Building our Future”. The report published yesterday analysed the […]

READ MORE →

Financial secrecy in football: time for action

bigben-mcbigbenfaceEveryone has known for years that football is rotten to the core and financial secrecy is at the heart of the problem. Why then is no one doing anything about it? This post from the Offshore Game project originally features in the Independent. 

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top