The Piketty controversy and the offshore wealth problem

   0   0 Blog, Inequality & Tax Havens

As many readers will already know, there’s a big controversy going on regarding Prof. Thomas Piketty’s world-famous economics work Capital in the 21st Century, with the Financial Times alleging that he faces a ‘Reinhardt-Rogoff moment’ because of data problems. Piketty responds that he’s been transparent about everything and the FT is being ‘ridiculous’ to suggest that it undermines his central conclusions that inequality, particularly at the top of the income scales, has been rising.

We aren’t going to plunge into this debate except to remark that – at the current moment — most pundits seem to agree that further investigation is warranted into the FT’s findings, but that even if the analysis is flawed, the problems that have been identified don’t undermine Piketty’s central conclusions. As The Economist puts it:

“Based on the information Mr Giles has provided so far, however, the analysis does not seem to support many of the allegations made by the FT, or the conclusion that the book’s argument is wrong.”

And of course, as many have remarked, the FT’s claim that inequality isn’t rising just doesn’t pass the “smell test,” as Paul Krugman and many others note. The evidence is everywhere. Just look at this latest tale, for example.

But that’s not really why we’re writing. We’re most interested in this comment in Piketty’s response:

“My estimates on wealth concentration do not fully take into account offshore wealth, and are likely to err on the low side.”

Which is another useful reminder that we think he is underestimating his own underestimation, because we think the main offshore wealth study he refers to (he also does refer to ours, in footnote 55 on p466) itself errs on the low side. Given that many, many trillions of dollars are sitting offshore – the large majority of them perched among the top 1.0 percent and 0.1 percent – that’s going to be quite a significant factor.

Read more here – with more to come.


Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]

READ MORE →

Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.

READ MORE →

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]

READ MORE →

Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top