It seems that Credit Suisse’s fine may be tax-deductible after all

   0   0 Blog
"Are we Swiss all criminals?" The poster asks. No. But many Swiss bankers are.

“Are we Swiss all criminals?” The poster asks. No. But many Swiss bankers are.

We have written recently about how Credit Suisse’s $2.6 billion fine for its history of abusing the U.S. tax system and facilitating high crimes may seem like a lot of money, but it could — and should — have been a lot worse. Why did no bankers go to jail? And, perhaps more importantly, why does it still have its U.S. banking licence?

But there has been a palliative, it seems: according to reports:

“As part of its plea agreement, Credit Suisse agrees to forego any kind of tax deduction for any of the payments it makes.”

Which is fine and dandy — good, in fact, as far as it goes. But now, from the Swiss newspaper Le Matin:

“During the UBS scandal, the debates raged in parliament. Then, nothing happened. Or, in fact, a majority of the parties on the right (UDC and PLR) buried the idea of preventing the fines to be deductible from their profits (for tax purposes.) The result is that the record fine that Credit Suisse has just been hit with in the United States (US$2.6 billion) may be deductible after all.”

In other words, U.S. taxpayers won’t be sticking with the bill, but CS may well foist it on ordinary Swiss citizens instead. Let’s see what happens: the outcome is currently uncertain.

If it ends up being tax-deductible, one may conclude that this is poetic justice of a kind, given Switzerland’s role as a large, mucky tax haven. And it will doubtless infuriate many ordinary Swiss people, being stuck with part of the bill for all this criminality: this will doubtless provoke debate and reflection in Swiss society, which is much needed.  If truth be told, we don’t have a beef with ordinary Swiss taxpayers: it’s the jurisdiction and its tax and secrecy laws that bother us.

And besides, the United States is hardly one to talk about being a tax haven.

Hat tip: James Henry.


Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]

READ MORE →

Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.

READ MORE →

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]

READ MORE →

Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top