Swiss reject OECD’s new transparency project

   0   0 Blog, Information Exchange
"Are we Swiss all criminals?" The poster asks. No. But many Swiss bankers are.

“Are we Swiss all criminals?” The poster asks. No. But many Swiss bankers are.

Switzerland, it seems, has rejected the OECD’s new project on automatic information exchange, out of hand.

Even before the ink was dry on the OECD report, Switzerland’s Federal Department of Finance said:

“The Federal Council will give its opinion on adopting this standard as soon as it has been adopted globally.”

Our emphasis added. That is the ‘level playing field’ argument: secrecy jurisdiction speak for ‘Get Lost.” This is the same old weaselly argument that jurisdictions always use to worm their way out of committing to international initiatives. It is an implicit, rather than an explicit, rejection of the the OECD’s standard.

But it’s a rejection.

In other words, Switzerland will wait until the Cook Islands, Niue, Hong Kong, Singapore, the British Virgin Islands, and everyone else, have adopted the standard – and only then will they “give their opinion on adopting this standard.” And if a single one of those jurisdictions takes a similar position (Luxembourg? Austria?) then Switzerland won’t budge.

Certain people in Switzerland claim their country is not a secrecy jurisdiction. Not only does it remain a gigantic secrecy jurisdiction, but it is a devious saboteur of a secrecy jurisdiction.

We salute those in Switzerland, such as Alliance Sud and the Berne Declaration, that have stood up against their offshore financial centre. But internal pressure isn’t going to be enough.

As we said in our response to the OECD report, sanctions are required. We ask for three things.

  1. The OECD must put a sanctions mechanism in place. The ‘level playing field’ argument must not be a way out.
  2. Before that happens, countries (and the EU?) must consider sanctions against recalcitrant jurisdictions.
  3. Civil society around the world must call Switzerland to account.

Aux armes, citoyens!


Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]

READ MORE →

Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.

READ MORE →

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]

READ MORE →

Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top