
We received this email yesterday about opposition in Denmark to a deal to sell a big stake in the state energy company Dong to Goldman Sachs, raising large civil society pushback, partly due to concerns about possible tax avoidance. Right now the lead story on the FT website is “Danish coalition on brink over Goldman deal”
From Sara Jespersen at Eurodad:
“The sale of shares in the State energy company DONG to Goldman Sachs have sparked furious debate. A petition with citizen signatures is now at more than 177.000 opposing this sale! (note Denmark has only 5.6 million inhabitants; the FT now updates with 188,000)
The Copenhagen Post reports:
“The DONG and Sachs sale came under the microscope after it was revealed that the investment bank will administrate its ownership from shell corporations in Luxembourg, the US state of Delaware and the Cayman Islands, all well-known tax havens.”
Jespersen continues:
A big part of the debate is about how Goldman Sachs contributed to the crisis in 2008, but also how they might very well not pay taxes in Denmark due to their corporate structure.
Media stories here and here. Of course they deny that tax dodging will take place – but those kinds of denials are ten a penny and although we haven’t reviewed this particular structure, these kinds of deals do tend to cost ordinary taxpayers substantial sums.
See a graphics on Goldman Sachs corporate ownership for this buy-up here (scroll down,) and see pictures from stunt today in front the parliament in Copenhagen here.”
Related articles

UN tax convention hub – updates & resources
What should we be worried about? Estimating bilateral illicit financial risk envelopes for major developed and developing economies
10 November 2026
What does the global FDI network actually look like? Opening the black box of offshore investment
10 November 2026
Mapping illicit financial networks linked to actors in countries with weak rule of law: A global investment census approach
10 November 2026

Indicator deep dive: Reporting of tax avoidance schemes

The ‘wealth exodus’ was manufactured by the press. The press complaints body IPSO must investigate or step aside.

Review: Bloomberg’s reporting of an exodus of billionaires worth $160 billion does not hold

Launching a new tool to reveal the global extent of illicit financial flows and how to tackle them

UN Framework Convention – Roundup of the Fifth Session of Negotiations
Notes on the UN tax convention draft protocol on dispute prevention and resolution
11 September 2026

