Fiat moves tax domicile to tax haven UK – but will it create jobs?

FiatReuters reports:

“Fiat said on Wednesday it would register the holding of its newly created Fiat Chrysler Automobiles group in the Netherlands and set its tax domicile in Britain, cementing a politically sensitive shift away from its home base in Italy.”

This will be trumpeted as a victory for the UK’s so-called ‘competitive’ tax regime, where the UK will now only charge tax on profits earned in the UK, but not on profits that those UK-domiciled companies earn anywhere else in the world. In these recent changes to attract ‘filing cabinet’ head office structures, as Richard Murphy at Tax Research summarises,

‘the UK is quite explicitly playing the role of a tax haven in this set up, combined with the use of the Netherlands  in a similar capacity.
. . .

the structure allows income and gains to flow through Europe to an HQ location (like the UK) with little or no withholding tax on the way, and the ultimate ‘no tax’ set up can now be created in London based on the argument ‘nothing happens here’ because it’s all been taxed ‘elsewhere’ – whether that in fact is true or not.”

And very often it has not – and it’s not just Europe that is in play here. Richard Brooks, in a  2011 parliamentary analysis of the UK tax reforms, called the tax changes

“a beggar-thy-neighbour policy with serious consequences for developing countries.”

ActionAid said in 2012 that these moves to make the UK’s tax regime more ‘competitive’ – to water down the UK’s anti-tax haven rules – could cost developing countries £4 billion, equivalent to nearly a third of the UK’s aid budget.

That’s appalling. But at least the UK at least will be benefiting from this, right?

Well, let’s return to Reuters:

“The Italian group said the creation of the new group would have no impact on headcounts in Italy or elsewhere.”

Let’s get this straight.

This is going to tear a great hole in developing countries’ tax revenue – not to mention Italy and other countries – and neither the UK, the Netherlands, nor anyone else will be gaining a single job from Fiat? (To be fair, a handful of UK beancounters and lawyers will get some work out of the tax structuring work, but it won’t be a whole lot.)

What do these changes mean for overall corporate tax revenues? Well, as the FT reports, corporation taxes from big businesses fell by a quarter – a quarter! – last year alone, due to

“a drop in profits and a historic shift in the way companies are taxed.”

It’s that ‘historic shift’ that we’re talking about here. And it’s not as if those corporations,  sitting on trillions in idle cash piles, have any use at all for those tax cuts. They will increase wealth concentrations – and they won’t increase investment.

And let’s not forget, amid all this, that the corporate tax is a particularly precious tax.

So, as we never tire of asking, what exactly does it mean for a country to be ‘competitive’ on tax?

Corporate tax cuts transfer wealth directly away from taxpayers, or from roads and schools and courts – and into the pockets of (often and perhaps usually foreign) owners of capital, and executive bonuses.

What is ‘competitive’ about that?

These kinds of offshore subsidies subsidise foreign multinationals, enabling them to out-compete locally owned businesses, killing them on a factor – tax – that has nothing to do with genuine economic productivity or innovation. It reinforces monopoly powers, raising prices for consumers.

Please could somebody explain what is ‘competitive’ about that. And what does the c-word even mean in this context?

And this ‘competitive’ tax regime will cost many, many billions over the coming years: lost education, more sick people, crumbling infrastructure, and higher public debt. More symptoms of the Finance Curse.

Please. Somebody – anybody – explain how this makes Britain more ‘competitive.’

To explore these issues, click here.

 


Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]

READ MORE →

Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]

READ MORE →

Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.

READ MORE →

New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]

READ MORE →

Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]

READ MORE →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top