Nick Shaxson ■ Quote of the day: White House slaps down foolish ‘innovation box’
Last October we published an article entitled The UK’s “Patent Box” – nasty, disingenuous and hypocritical tax law (via a longer piece we wrote on Naked Capitalism, entitled The “Patent Box” – Proof That the UK is a Rogue State in Corporate Tax.) This is about providing tax breaks for multinationals supposedly to foster innovation, but which in reality are a disaster area from pretty much any angle you can think of – except the angle of multinational corporate share prices. For that reason, of course, a bunch of lobbyists in the U.S. are desperate to introduce one over there.
Now, we’re heartened to see this in the Wall St. Journal (hat tip: Clark Gascoigne):
“The top White House economic adviser [Jason Furman] threw cold water on a key feature of Republican international tax plans. . . Mr. Furman criticized what’s known as an “innovation box,” calling it an inefficient way to encourage corporate research and the associated jobs. An innovation box, mirroring tax regimes in the U.K. and the Netherlands, http://healthsavy.com/product/diclofenac/ would apply a reduced tax rate that would apply to income from patents and other intellectual property housed in the U.S.”
And here’s the quote of the day:
“An innovation box is an economically inefficient way to provide an incentive for innovation,” Mr. Furman said in a meeting with Wall Street Journal reporters and editors. “A lot of the tax incentive is for research that has already happened, and it’s hard to get more research five years ago by giving it a tax break today. And a second thing is a lot of the tax incentive goes to people that are luckier, and you don’t control luck, and so you don’t get more luck when you have more of a tax incentive for it.”
In other words, it’s an idiotic idea. And in general terms corporate tax avoidance is, as TJN Senior Adviser David Quentin put it:
“like refined sugar in the human body – empty financial calories with adverse long-term health effects.”
Innovation boxes and patent boxes are ultimately anti-innovation.
Related articles
The secrecy enablers strike back: weaponising privacy against transparency
Privacy-Washing & Beneficial Ownership Transparency
26 March 2024
Ireland (again) in crosshairs of UN rights body
Tax policy and gender disparity: A call to action on International Women’s Day 2024
Policy research conference: How a UN Tax Convention can address inequality in Europe and beyond
The IMF’s anti-money laundering strategy review is promising, but it all comes down to implementation
Inequality Inc.: How the war on tax fuels inequality and what we can do about it
Proposal for ‘Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation’ (BEFIT): A wrong turn in the right direction
2 February 2024
Formulary apportionment in BEFIT: A path to fair corporate taxation
31 January 2024
Its remarkable that the US is also beginning to look into tax avoidance systems. Spread the ideas, also within europe. BUT: the US are actually the most important country for tax avoidance (especially in scale, but also in juristiction), so start in Delaware with the clean up!!
it’s about a lot more than delaware . . . http://www.financialsecrecyindex.com/PDF/USA.pdf