
John Christensen ■ Directors’ duties and tax avoidance: a view from the U.S.

Last year we obtained a legal opinion from Farrer’s & Co which concluded that it was not possible to construe a director’s duty to maximise benefits to a company to include a positive duty to avoid tax. This opinion has helped to nail the urban myth (widely propagated by tax planners to their clients) that failure to engage actively in tax avoidance would constitute a breach of fiduciary duties.
Our attention has now been drawn to a blog by an influential U.S. lawyer noting the UK legal opinion and asking whether the same applies in the United States. The article addresses the issue of whether the business judgement rule, would inhibit directors from taking positive action to comply with prevailing tax rules or to not comply. He concludes that the BJR would do neither:
As I read the US cases, the answer is that the BJR would in fact protect either decision from judicial review.
Useful to have this view on the US position.
More here.
Related articles

How we win: the Tax Justice Network podcast, January 2021

The US beneficial ownership law has its weaknesses, but it’s a seismic shift

Argentina keeps pushing to be at the vanguard of transparency. Now they need to make more information public

The Tax Justice Network January 2021 Spanish language podcast, Justicia ImPositiva: impuesto a la riqueza

How a mini movement overturned secret US shell companies

Data havens: how to tackle the new digital race to the bottom

Big Tobacco, big tax abuse

Taxing Wall Street: the Tax Justice Network December 2020 podcast

Researcher vacancies at the Tax Justice Network: Latin America and Francophone Africa
