The Offshore Wrapper: a week in tax justice

   0   0 Blog, Capital Flight, Corruption, Regular Features
The Offshore Wrapper is written by George Turner, c/o Wrapper Towers

The Offshore Wrapper is written by George Turner, c/o Wrapper Towers

Forever in your debt

Last week saw news of a major decision from the US Supreme Court on the long running feud between the Government of Argentina and vulture fund, NML Capital.

The case centres on NML Capital’s $2.5bn acquisition of Argentine debt at heavily discounted rates after the Latin American country defaulted in 2001.

Some 90% of Argentina’s creditors accepted a restructuring deal where they would receive 30 cents on the dollar.

Not NML capital though. It filed 11 law suits against Argentine government, seeking payment of the full amount.

The Supreme Court handed down two judgements last week on this case. The first was a refusal by the court to hear an appeal over whether Argentina needed to make payments to NML at all.

A second was a substantive judgement where Argentina had contested the right of the bondholders to discover where Argentina’s assets are located around the world. As Argentina has refused the pay NML Capital, the bondholders are seeking to seize Argentina’s assets, including financial assets passing through New York.

Not pretty

Not pretty

The case has implications for every developing country that borrows money, because if NML Capital succeeds it will be extremely difficult for developing countries to renegotiate their debts in a crisis.

Patrick Mayoyo writing in Kenya’s Daily Nation highlighted some of the issues for Kenya. Kenya recently took the decision to settle a debt with First Mercantile, now based in Switzerland but previously of the British Virgin Islands. The government of Kenya was forced to pay up despite First Mercantile being implicated in the Anglo-Leasing corruption scandal in Kenya.

So who are NML capital?

NML capital is a fund managed by Paul Singer. Mr Singer has made a career of forcing poor countries to line his pockets through court action.  He once purchased debt issued by the Republic of Congo for $10m and then sued the government for $400m. He ended up with $127m.

NML is based in the Cayman Islands so it seems that while NML is insistent that it must have a larger share of the tax revenues of poorer countries, it seems less willing to pay tax in the United States.


Europe’s next top money launderer?

UBS under investigation.  Again

UBS under investigation. Again

Just weeks after a US Justice department found Credit Suisse to be running a “criminal organisation” facilitating thousands of US citizens to evade taxes, a senior executive at Switzerland’s other banking goliath has now been charged with organised crime, money laundering, illegal practice and serious organised fiscal fraud. The allegations revolve around a multi-billion euro tax fraud involving Mr Bruehwiler, CEO of UBS’s Belgian branch. He denies the charges.

This is not the first time UBS has faced serious charges. In 2009 UBS admitted helping US citizens to avoid taxes and was hit with a $780m fine. The bank says that since 2009 it has carefully examined its rules and tightened them where necessary.

All of this scandal seems to have passed by the International Chamber of Commerce, the self-styled “world business organisation”. The ICC this week published a report calling for lower regulation of the banking system. It said that adherence to anti-money laundering regulations could damage trade.

Here at Wrapper Towers, we are indebted to the ICC for alerting us to this very real danger. Previously we had been labouring under the misapprehension that money laundering damaged trade. Now we can concentrate on what’s really important.


McLaren overtaken by events

McLaren Formula One has been thwarted in its attempt to have the British tax payer pay for fines it incurred when it was caught trying to spy on its rivals. The racing team was fined £32m in 2007 which it then tried to claim as a tax deductible business expense.

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs disagreed and took the team to court. HMRC lost, but that bizarre ruling was overturned on appeal last week.


The Tax Haven Candidate still frontrunner for European Commission president

The tax haven candidate

The tax haven candidate

A few weeks ago we reported on former prime minister of Luxembourg Jean-Claude Juncker’s poor record on financial transparency. This week there is more background in Private Eye.

Despite this, the Tax Haven Candidate is still leading the race for the European Commission. Juncker has secured support from François Hollande, who has been highly critical of tax havens in the past.

The British Prime Minister David Cameron will call for a vote later this week on who will become the next leader of the European Commission.

The EU Commissioner is an incredibly important role shaping the future of European financial markets and tax havens are a major problem inside the European Union, as this article on Cyprus published recently in Quartz demonstrates.

Will the EU’s reforms on tax havens stall if Juncker triumphs? The Wrapper will be following this one with interest.


Will the real Deloitte please stand up?

Deloitte's Bill Dodwell

Deloitte’s Bill Dodwell

Deloitte, one of the Big Four accountancy firms, is threatened with court action by the creators of the famous Icebreaker tax dodge.

Icebreaker was a tax avoidance scheme used by many celebrities in the UK to write off millions in taxes. It was challenged and defeated by HMRC at a tribunal.

Afterwards Bill Dodwell, the head of tax policy for Deloitte, publicly congratulated the tribunal for defeating the scheme and said any appeal would be doomed to fail.

Icebreaker management were a little surprised to see this. It had instructed Deloitte as their solicitors to defend them at the tribunal.


Petition against FIFA’s tax breaks

Send him off

Send him off

In recent weeks we have reported that Brazil was forced by Fifa to turn itself into a Tax Haven  country for the duration of the World Cup meaning it will see very little back from the hundreds of millions it has spent on the tournament.

Now a local Brazilian Group has started a petition drawing attention to this shoddy state of affairs. Feel free to register your protest here.




Related Posts

The Offshore Wrapper: the Panama Papers, one year on

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceWelcome to the Offshore Wrapper – your weekly update from TJN.  Happy Paniversary! This week it’s been one year since the Panama Papers were leaked, and a number of organisations around the world have been marking the occasion though the global week of action for tax justice. In London, activists from the TJN and the […]


Protesting PwC: Professionals Without Conscience

Photos from the Protest outside PwC 1 Embankment Place, part of the Global week of action for tax justiceThis week is the global week of action for tax justice and on Wednesday 5th April activists from the Tax Justice Network and Methodists for Tax Justice held a protest outside the London offices of Price Waterhouse Coopers. The global week of action for tax justice is happening one year after the release of the […]


Germany moves forward on corporate transparency

ReichstagThe Bundesrat has today voted to recommend implementing a public register of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts.  Great news from Germany, as the country takes an important step forward towards corporate transparency.


New estimates reveal the extent of tax avoidance by multinationals

Price Waterhouse CoopersNew figures published today by the Tax Justice Network provide a country-level breakdown of the estimated tax losses to profit shifting by multinational companies. Applying a methodology developed by researchers at the International Monetary Fund to an improved dataset, the results indicate global losses of around $500 billion a year. The figures appear in a […]


Banking Secrecy in China, its related territories and Taiwan

Hong Kong from Sky 100Foreword. The Tax Justice Network is a non partisan network of experts working towards transparency, so we do not take any position about countries’ territorial and political claims. However, we do expect countries with a de jure (legal) or de facto (in practice) influence over other territories, to take responsibility for their power. We point […]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top